Insurers often rely on introductory phrases in exclusions, such as the phrase “relating to,” to expand the scope of exclusions beyond all reasonable bounds. The Eleventh Circuit recently reaffirmed that insurance exclusions — including those broadly drafted to exclude any claim “relating to” an excluded risk — should have meaningful limits and must be interpreted
The Eleventh Circuit’s recent decision in L. Squared Industries, Inc. v. Nautilus Insurance Co. offers important guidance for policyholders navigating notice provisions under claims-made insurance policies—particularly when a policy imposes both a policy-period notice requirement and a separate “prompt notice” clause.
L. Squared Industries owned and operated gas stations in Florida and purchased a
Insurance coverage disputes often rise or fall on sweeping questions — trigger theories, allocation frameworks, priority of coverage. But sometimes the battle comes down to something dramatically smaller: a comma. Or, as two recent cases reveal, the lack of a comma. Both Garlock v. Jordan, 260 N.E.3d 42 (Ohio Ct. App. 2025), and Accelerant
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is a comprehensive set of regulations governing federal procurement — prescribing how agencies acquire goods and services and how contractors compete for, win, and perform government contracts. This encyclopedia of federal procurement addresses everything from debriefing rights to small business subcontracting requirements to how agencies should evaluate proposals. It also